Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Editor's Pick

How To Stop Criminals From Exploiting DeFi, According To Polygon Labs

Polygon Labs – the main developers behind the blockchain scaling network Polygon – published a research paper on Monday explaining how the government should go about regulating the DeFi industry.

From the Treasury Department to the U.S. Senate, politicians have been loudly criticizing crypto’s potential use for money laundering and terrorist financing, especially when leveraging the power of smart contracts.

Regulating Cryptocurrency and Blockchain

The paper says that current legislative attempts to protect financial integrity within DeFi are off the mark.

“Traditional finance integrity laws and regulations attach to intermediaries, including — with respect to anti-money laundering obligations — those intermediaries the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) defines as “financial institutions,” reads the paper’s summary document.

“These current laws are not amenable to intermediary-less, blockchain-based software systems like decentralized finance (“DeFi”),” it continues.

1/ Today, @m_mosier_ @katjagilman & I are sharing a paper that begins a conversation around, & proposes a conceptual framework for, how to answer the “illicit finance” policy question as it relates to DeFi. A brief thread below, with links to the full paper + a summary document. pic.twitter.com/1OQ1gCHiAX

— Rebecca Rettig (@RebeccaRettig1) January 29, 2024

Authors of the paper include Polygon Labs’ chief legal officer Rebecca Rettig, former FinCEN acting director Michael Mosier, and Polygon’s public policy lead Katja Gilman.

The company’s assessment isn’t unique: the Treasury Department wrote that sufficiently decentralized DeFi services “may not be explicitly subject to AML/CFT obligations” in its Illicit Finance Risk Assessment of Decentralized Finance last year.

How Polygon Labs Proposes to Regulate DeFi

Polygon proposes a three-step solution to the legal conundrum, first by creating a legal definition for “System Control Persons” or “SCPs”.

These are people or entities with “unilateral ability to exercise operational authority over any third-party value in a blockchain-based software system.” As such, they would need to follow standard AML requirements, even if the system describes itself as “decentralized.”

By contrast, systems without SCPs (“genuine DeFi”) would need a separate classification as “critical infrastructure” that is overseen by the OCCIP.

Finally, businesses interacting with genuine DeFi, while being obligated to protect U.S. national security interests, would not be regulated as “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

This differs from crypto-critical senator Elizabeth Warren’s suggestions last month that crypto firms should be subject to the same AML requirements as traditional banks. Warren has also claimed that North Korea is funding half of its nuclear arms program with crypto

Polygon’s summary concludes:

“The proposal herein overlays the policy goals underlying the financial integrity regime in the United States with the realities of the technology in an attempt to begin to answer questions posed by regulators and policymakers.”

The post How To Stop Criminals From Exploiting DeFi, According To Polygon Labs appeared first on Cryptonews.

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

Colorado-based pastor Eligio “Eli” Regalado and his wife, Kaitlyn, are facing legal action after allegedly defrauding investors of millions of dollars through the sale...

Economy

How can Forex crash? Forex market crash history Fact that the Forex is one of the most volatile and most profitable markets in the...

Stock

Enthusiasm is needed to drive an uptrend, but sometimes enthusiasm can go too far. That is why technical analysts like to use various sentiment...

Editor's Pick

As decentralized naming systems gain traction, Ethereum Name Service has seen ENS price double, leaving some FOMO investors asking is it too late to...

Disclaimer: happyretirementstories.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


Copyright © 2024 happyretirementstories.com